My conference project was making glitch art. I took patterns that I made in GIMP, then I put them into Java with the software, Processing. The first three images are the patterns that I made. The last pattern was already glitched inside of photoshop, then it was put into processing. The last three images are frames from the coded program. The code turned out just the way I wanted it to. Granted, I only have so much control over what the final product looks like because the code is semi-generative. But, I am completely happy with how my programs turned out! The colors all look great, and I like the way they change. The thing I am not happy with in my project is how the frames saved. There is a lot of black that gets added into the images, which muddies the image and hides a lot of the detail. I am not exactly sure why it happens, but it makes the project look less like how I want it too. A lot changed from when I started to what I ended up with. I experimented a lot with different ways the glitch could be created and how it affected the image. I made many small changes that either changed a lot in the way the code works or changed only a slight amount. I took the three versions that I liked the most out of everything and then made more changes to those. I added some coded patterns, which helped the code become less stagnant and change the color. The patterns I created were easy to come up with; they took a little bit of maneuvering to get right, but they weren’t too difficult to incorporate. The last glitch that I made (the last image) took a little more work to get the additional patterns included. I struggled getting colors that I liked to match the glitch. I wanted similar colors, but they either didn’t look quite right, or they didn’t stand out enough. In the same glitch, I originally had a different base pattern that got glitched, but I ended changing it to the final version because I thought it looked better and I liked the colors better. I like how my work turned out overall. I think it suits my style as an artist, and I think that if I were to do the same project over again, I would end up with a similar project.
I thought that projector night was really fun. I had a blast putting up my work onto the walls and having people see it. My friends came to look at the work, which made the experience even better. It’s a wonderful experience to have your friends see work that you have worked on for a while. I thought that the night went well and everyone’s work looked great. I liked seeing what everyone put on the walls, and how they decided to map them onto the walls. What I did to plan for projector night was fairly simple. I decided to use half of the classroom to project, and I liked the segmented walls. The segments in the walls made a nice guideline to place my videos in. I treated each segment or two as a video and combined multiple videos together. While preparing for projector night, my projection got larger and larger. Originally it took up half of the height of the wall, but when projector night came about, the projection reached the entire length of the wall. I think that almost everything that happened during projector night happened as expected. One thing that did not go as planned was a change in my map; some segments got distorted and deleted, and then the others got messed up, so I had to start the maps over. I think that my maps should be seen as cheerful and fun. I use a lot of bright colors and fast movements to create a more playful vibe. I think that my maps looked as they should have, and I am happy with how they looked. I mapped them how I wanted to. However, if I were to map the same work again, I might map the videos half on the wall and half on the floor. I think that that would look pretty cool.
I am making a series of glitch art. It’s made with the programming language, Java, and it’s made with the program processing. The series takes patterns that I made with Gimp and shifts the pixels around to create a glitch effect. The art pieces are constantly changing, and the original image is almost completely unrecognizable. I wanted to make this series because I think glitches look really cool. I wanted to learn how to make glitch art, and I also wanted to do more art with coding. This project allows me to combine both programming and glitch art. The project should be a series of short movies that show patterns changing into glitches. The viewer should see the change in the pattern, and they should see the pieces change a few times throughout the movie. My intentions for this project are to make interesting movies that surprise the viewer with unexpected glitches. So far, I think that my works look good, but I also think that they can go farther. There can be more changes in the work so that the glitching doesn’t stagnate at a certain point. With more change in the movies, I think that the series will be interesting to watch. I don’t know that the movies will look good in a typical sense, but they will definitely be fun and interesting to watch. I don’t think the movies will necessarily look good because they are glitches. Glitches aren’t supposed to “look good” but they are interesting. I plan on trying to add some more things into the code that help change the art over time. That way there is more change and the works look more interesting. All of my pieces are made with a variety of colors and patterns. Motion is used to change the are over time and add movement.
An artist that has inspired me is Patakk. Their work is geometric and tends to shift between different shapes. I like the simplicity of the gifs and how they move. Patakk uses many simple color schemes which I think are great. My plan for this project was to change the colors of my patterns and to add some effects to them as well. I like the disrupted look that the effect “shift” has on the gif. I like the colors I chose to use in my gifs, and I like how I went about changing the colors. While making the gifs I just went with what I thought looked good, and that’s where my colors came from. Overall, I’m happy with how my gifs turned out. I think they look great. I prefer the ones I made with Gimp rather than the ones I made with Processing. I think that the ones made with Gimp just have more interest to them than the ones I coded. I think that if I had added more color variety to the coded ones then they could have been better.
What I have finally made are shapes that change. I played around with different shapes using a call to ellipse and to curveVertex. I used color, height, noise, and width to change the shapes. Some pieces changed over time because I was not happy with how they looked. I wanted more change in certain pieces, so I changed those to reflect that. In some pieces, I liked how the vertex drawings changed, but the vertex drawings also kept increasing in size as well. I couldn’t control how the vertex drawings grew over time. I like how most of my pieces came out. I like the colors I used for my Pastel drawing. At first, getting shapes to change was difficult and I couldn’t figure out how to do it, but after messing with the code, I managed to change the shapes. From there, getting shapes to change was easier. Overall, I think I managed my time well, although I could have finished my last piece sooner. I think my pieces turned out well. I think I was able to show my vision for my project well. My projects were coded with active mode to bring the shapes to life. I used variables for conditionals, and to make certain coding easier. A lot of my pieces have similar color schemes, but in a few I experimented with color more; I used pastel colors and more contrasting colors for a few. All of my pieces are animated so that they move and add on through time. I used loops to make my pieces change and to create the vertex drawings. Noise creates the shapes in curveVertex. In one of my pieces, I used 3 dimensions to change the shape of the curveVertex.
My project will be pieces that start with a normal, solid shape but get distorted and changed over time. For example, I would start with a circle but change the shape over time to eventually make it no longer seem like a circle. I want to do this idea because the idea of taking a concrete shape and then making it more abstract is cool. I like interesting shapes that don’t stay the same. I expect the viewer to see a normal shape at first, but be surprised when the shape slowly gets more and more distorted. My conference work will show Galanter’s definition of generative art. My projects will use randomness and time to change the art, resulting in a completed piece. My work will not be completely random, but it will use an appropriate amount of randomness to change the piece and make it interesting to look at. I think my project will showcase the things I’ve learned throughout the class. My work will look good because I will use a fitting color scheme and make the pieces look interesting and unique. I built the idea for the project by drawing sketches of repeating, normal shapes and then I decided to slightly change the shape each time I drew it. I will use the active mode to allow the piece to move and change. I will use variables as a way to create a custom noise function. My functions will allow me to have the shapes change and be unique. I will use color to contrast the shapes with the background. Randomness will be added to the color to add interest. The draw function will animate the pieces, making the shapes move and change. Loops will be added to add shapes to the pieces. Loops will also allow me to add shapes over a time period.